Objections to probation

Many of the objections raised against probation are with regard to procedure adopted rather than the system itself. The important objections are as follows:

1. Probation is not a form of correction but it is a form of leniency which pampers an offender.

2. Probation enables an offender to avoid punishment which is necessary not only as a deterrent to crime and delinquency but also for maintaining law and order.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

3. After release on probation, the offender returns to the same family and community environment that contributed to his crime. He is therefore exposed to the same influences all over again.

4. Probation does not protect the community since the offender lives in the community and may repeat his crimes or delinquencies.

5. Since social investigation has not been made compulsory, the judge finds it difficult to decide whether or not the offender should be released on probation.

6. There is no provision for compulsory supervision, i.e., offenders are released under suspended sentences but without supervision. This needs to be criticised and looked into.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

7. The probation officers do not supervise the probationers properly due to heavy case-loads. The number of trained personnel is also insufficient. The supervision thus remains both inadequate and questionable.